https://past.asc-cybernetics.org/2010/?p=2162 July 30th to August 2nd 2010 (with surrounding events) Mon, 27 Dec 2010 03:03:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 https://past.asc-cybernetics.org/2010/?p=2162&cpage=1#comment-147 galkin Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:51:45 +0000 https://past.asc-cybernetics.org/2010/?p=2162#comment-147 Some suggestions following the list of questions: 1) min 5 - up to max 10 people 2) Would be better to have fixed groups, but we have to give participants right to decide individually if they want to move to different group 3) I see two ways: 1st is according to major conference themes - 2 or more groups but each works on 1 theme; 2nd - this idea was very popular in cybernetic art - random! 4) I would assign 1 coordinator per group (authority) and give a chance to participants who will to moderate, say half a day. 5) Coordinator and moderators of the day offer content leader(s) of the group to report. Otherwise moderator is the ideal reporter. 6) If we take a conference orientation towards interdisciplinarity as a criteria, than answer is - mixed background is better for groups. Everything else is on moderators... Some suggestions following the list of questions:
1) min 5 – up to max 10 people
2) Would be better to have fixed groups, but we have to give participants right to decide individually if they want to move to different group
3) I see two ways: 1st is according to major conference themes – 2 or more groups but each works on 1 theme; 2nd – this idea was very popular in cybernetic art – random!
4) I would assign 1 coordinator per group (authority) and give a chance to participants who will to moderate, say half a day.
5) Coordinator and moderators of the day offer content leader(s) of the group to report. Otherwise moderator is the ideal reporter.
6) If we take a conference orientation towards interdisciplinarity as a criteria, than answer is – mixed background is better for groups. Everything else is on moderators…

]]> https://past.asc-cybernetics.org/2010/?p=2162&cpage=1#comment-58 admin Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:46:21 +0000 https://past.asc-cybernetics.org/2010/?p=2162#comment-58 To give some background on the format of C:ADM2010, we have posted a short text by Nagib Callaos on conversational conferences <a href="https://past.asc-cybernetics.org/2010/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Integrating-the-conversational-format-.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Callaos uses conversational sessions in his WMSCI conferences, basing them largely on Bela Banathy's Fuschl Conversations, themselves a development of the workshop conferences on Self Reference that Annetta Pedretti organised in the late 1970s. And onwards, backwards. We think the text may be of interest and help to our conferees. Many thanks to Nagib. To give some background on the format of C:ADM2010, we have posted a short text by Nagib Callaos on conversational conferences here. Callaos uses conversational sessions in his WMSCI conferences, basing them largely on Bela Banathy’s Fuschl Conversations, themselves a development of the workshop conferences on Self Reference that Annetta Pedretti organised in the late 1970s. And onwards, backwards. We think the text may be of interest and help to our conferees. Many thanks to Nagib.

]]>